Anne Roback Morse (...)But I didn’t know back then that Germany was dying. No one told me that the Germany I visited in 2008 had a half million fewer souls than in 2003. What happened to these half million souls? They died—of old age, mostly.Life expectancy in Germany has increased 11 years in the past half-century. But in addition to living longer, Germans have stopped making babies. At its present fertility rate of 1.4 children, Germany has a fertility rate that is well below replacement (2.1 children per woman). Although half of the world’s population now lives in a country with a below-replacement fertility, the shift to low fertility is still a relatively new phenomenon for most countries. Not in Germany, however; it has had below replacement fertility for forty-five (45) years. Immigration, although often touted as a solution for low-fertility, is only a short-term bandage for a dying country. After all, immigrants conform to local fertility patterns within a generation or two. Not only that, but the high-fertility countries from which people emigrate are also experiencing decreasing fertility and the imminent prospect of shrinking populations themselves. In other words, there are fewer and fewer people in the world who are available to emigrate, while more and more countries are vying for immigrants to stymie domestic labor shortages. Germany already welcomes anywhere from 100,000 to 200,000 immigrants every year, but the German population is shrinking anyway. In fact, the German population peaked in 2003 at 82 million persons and has been shrinking ever since. Germany is currently losing 640 people every day. This remarkable statistic places Germany on an exclusive list: it is one of four countries in the world that are shrinking (deaths more than births) by more than 100,000 people per year. (The other three countries are Japan, Russia, and the Ukraine.) Japan’s shrinking population receives plenty of press coverage as Japan’s politicians flail to stem the country’s labor implosion. Russia’s shrinking population gets media coverage because its demography disaster is marked by a salaciously short life expectancy, with shockingly high rates of vodka consumption and suicide. And the Ukraine’s demographic crisis has been lost in the coverage of its political upheaval. But even though Germany is shrinking faster than Japan, itspopulation problem isn’t receiving much press. Both Japan and Germany are ageing rapidly, both have social pension systems, and Germany’s population is expected to shrink by 10 million people between today and 2050—that’s more than the entire population of Sweden! The 10 million number includes Germany’s 4 million expected immigrants. Without immigration, Germany is expected to shrink by 14 million people by 2050. Perhaps people are afraid to talk about childbirth in Germany because the Nazis horribly manipulated reproduction as part of their attempt to create a master-race. Even though some people have authoritarian or elitist answers to the population question, the question itself is neutral. Shrinking populations present problems in Germany, just as they do in Japan. Germany needs to have a frank public discussion about population. While the economy is not the root cause of low fertility, comprehensive tax protection for parents would be a solid first step towards demographic recovery. So it is time that Germany and all countries with low fertility ask the pressing questions about population. Why is an otherwise prosperous society not fulfilling the most basic metric of self-replacement? Why is Germany apparently prepared to bequeath a future to a single grandchild of a dying population, with all the corresponding economic and social evils that will then ensue?
source : http://choosing-him.blogspot.com, http://pinterest.com, http://google.com
0 Response to "Germany to shrink by 10 million people by 2050"
Posting Komentar